↓ Skip to main content

Human T-Lymphotropic Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Human T-Lymphotropic Viruses'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Serological and Molecular Methods to Study Epidemiological Aspects of Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Infection
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Molecular Epidemiology Database for Sequence Management and Data Mining
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Reporter Systems to Study HTLV-1 Transmission
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Quantitative Analysis of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1) Infection Using Co-Culture with Jurkat LTR-Luciferase or Jurkat LTR-GFP Reporter Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Isolation of Exosomes from HTLV-Infected Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Luciferase Functional Quantitative Assay for Measuring NF-ĸB Promoter Transactivation Mediated by HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Tax Proteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Generation of a Tet-On Expression System to Study Transactivation Ability of Tax-2
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 EGF Uptake and Degradation Assay to Determine the Effect of HTLV Regulatory Proteins on the ESCRT-Dependent MVB Pathway
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Methods for Identifying and Examining HTLV-1 HBZ Post-translational Modifications
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 High-Throughput Mapping and Clonal Quantification of Retroviral Integration Sites
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 STR Profiling of HTLV-1-Infected Cell Lines
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Expression of HTLV-1 Genes in T-Cells Using RNA Electroporation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Quantification of Cell Turnover in the Bovine Leukemia Virus Model
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of NK Cell Function and Receptor Expression During HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Infection
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Overview of Targeted Therapies for Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
Attention for Chapter 4: Quantitative Analysis of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1) Infection Using Co-Culture with Jurkat LTR-Luciferase or Jurkat LTR-GFP Reporter Cells
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Quantitative Analysis of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1) Infection Using Co-Culture with Jurkat LTR-Luciferase or Jurkat LTR-GFP Reporter Cells
Chapter number 4
Book title
Human T-Lymphotropic Viruses
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6872-5_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6870-1, 978-1-4939-6872-5
Authors

Alais, Sandrine, Dutartre, Hélène, Mahieux, Renaud, Sandrine Alais, Hélène Dutartre, Renaud Mahieux

Abstract

Unlike HIV-1, HTLV-1 viral transmission requires cell-to-cell contacts, while cell-free virions are poorly infectious and almost absent from body fluids. Though the virus uses three nonexclusive mechanisms to infect new target cells: (1) MTOC polarization followed by formation of a virological synapse and viral transfer into a synaptic cleft, (2) genesis of a viral biofilm and its transfer of embedded viruses, or (3) HTLV-1 transmission using conduits. The Tax transactivator and the p8 viral proteins are involved in virological synapse and nanotube formation respectively.HTLV-1 transcription from the viral promoter (i.e., LTR) requires the Tax protein that is absent from the viral particle and is expressed after productive infection. The present chapter focuses on a series of protocols used to quantify HTLV-1 de novo infection of target cells. These techniques do not discriminate between the different modes of transmission, but allow an accurate measure of productive infection. We used cell lines that are stably transfected with LTR-GFP or LTR-luciferase plasmids and quantified Green Fluorescent Protein expression or luciferase activity, since both of them reflect Tax expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,276,970
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,160
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,050
of 308,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#71
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.