↓ Skip to main content

Cell Division Machinery and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Unbalanced Growth, Senescence and Aging
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Unbalanced Growth, Senescence and Aging
Chapter number 8
Book title
Cell Division Machinery and Disease
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57127-0_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-957125-6, 978-3-31-957127-0
Authors

Michael Polymenis, Brian K. Kennedy, Polymenis, Michael, Kennedy, Brian K.

Editors

Monica Gotta, Patrick Meraldi

Abstract

Usually, cells balance their growth with their division. Coordinating growth inputs with cell division ensures the proper timing of division when sufficient cell material is available and affects the overall rate of cell proliferation. At a very fundamental level, cellular replicative lifespan-defined as the number of times a cell can divide, is a manifestation of cell cycle control. Hence, control of mitotic cell divisions, especially when the commitment is made to a new round of cell division, is intimately linked to replicative aging of cells. In this chapter, we review our current understanding, and its shortcomings, of how unbalanced growth and division, can dramatically influence the proliferative potential of cells, often leading to cellular and organismal aging phenotypes. The interplay between growth and division also underpins cellular senescence (i.e., inability to divide) and quiescence, when cells exit the cell cycle but still retain their ability to divide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,220,826
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#694
of 5,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,851
of 318,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#27
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.