↓ Skip to main content

Cell Division Machinery and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Consequences of Centrosome Dysfunction During Brain Development
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Consequences of Centrosome Dysfunction During Brain Development
Chapter number 2
Book title
Cell Division Machinery and Disease
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57127-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-957125-6, 978-3-31-957127-0
Authors

Nano, Maddalena, Basto, Renata, Maddalena Nano, Renata Basto

Editors

Monica Gotta, Patrick Meraldi

Abstract

Development requires cell proliferation, differentiation and spatial organization of daughter cells to occur in a highly controlled manner. The mode of cell division, the extent of proliferation and the spatial distribution of mitosis allow the formation of tissues of the right size and with the correct structural organization. All these aspects depend on cell cycle duration, correct chromosome segregation and spindle orientation. The centrosome, which is the main microtubule-organizing centre (MTOC) of animal cells, contributes to all these processes. As one of the most structurally complex organs in our body, the brain is particularly susceptible to centrosome dysfunction. Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH), primordial dwarfism disease Seckel syndrome (SCKS) and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II (MOPD-II) are often connected to mutations in centrosomal genes. In this chapter, we discuss the consequences of centrosome dysfunction during development and how they can contribute to the etiology of human diseases.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 29%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 20%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Chemistry 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,427,593
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,983
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,730
of 317,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#97
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.