You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing for Urinary Tract Infections
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 9 |
Book title |
Diagnostic Bacteriology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7037-7_9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7035-3, 978-1-4939-7037-7
|
Authors |
Anja Mezger, Mats Nilsson, Dan I. Andersson, Mezger, Anja, Nilsson, Mats, Andersson, Dan I. |
Editors |
Kimberly A. Bishop-Lilly |
Abstract |
Antibiotic susceptibility testing is important to guide clinicians in their choice of antibiotic used for treatment of bacterial infections. Current methods are time-consuming and more rapid alternatives are needed. Here, we describe a novel rapid method for antibiotic susceptibility testing which combines phenotypic and genotypic measurements. The use of padlock probes and rolling circle amplification allows for fast and precise determination of antibiotic susceptibilities as well as species identification. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 38% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Paraguay | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 40% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
Engineering | 2 | 20% |
Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,691,348
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,201
of 14,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,754
of 332,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#21
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.