↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Reverse Genetics for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Reverse Genetics for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus
Chapter number 3
Book title
Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6962-3, 978-1-4939-6964-7
Authors

Mingyuan Han, Hanzhong Ke, Yijun Du, Qingzhan Zhang, Dongwan Yoo, Han, Mingyuan, Ke, Hanzhong, Du, Yijun, Zhang, Qingzhan, Yoo, Dongwan

Editors

Daniel R. Perez

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a reemerging swine disease, and has become economically the most significant disease in pork production worldwide. The causative agent is PRRS virus (PRRSV), which is a member virus of the family Arteriviridae. The PRRSV genome is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA and is infectious. Two strategies in the PRRSV reverse genetics system have been employed for reconstitution of progeny virus: RNA transfection and DNA transfection. The PRRSV reverse genetics has broadly been used for studies including protein structure-function relationship, foreign gene expression, vaccine development, virulence determinants, and viral pathogenesis. Herein, we describe the modification of the pFL12 "RNA launch" reverse genetic system to the CMV promoter-driven pXJ41-FL13 "DNA launch" system. The generation of progeny PRRSV using pXJ41-FL13 is further elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,462,982
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,379
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,225
of 421,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#468
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.