↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Rapid Reverse Genetics Systems for Rhabdoviruses: From Forward to Reverse and Back Again
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Rapid Reverse Genetics Systems for Rhabdoviruses: From Forward to Reverse and Back Again
Chapter number 12
Book title
Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6962-3, 978-1-4939-6964-7, 978-1-4939-6962-3, 978-1-4939-6964-7
Authors

Tobias Nolden, Stefan Finke, Nolden, Tobias, Finke, Stefan

Editors

Daniel R. Perez

Abstract

Methods to recover recombinant negative strand RNA viruses (rNSVs) from cloned cDNAs have been significantly improved in more than two decades of NSV reverse genetics . In particular, for non-segmented negative strand RNA viruses (NNSVs ) like rhabdoviruses , time-consuming generation of reverse genetics systems by stitching PCR subfragments of genomic rhabdovirus cDNAs using ligase-based conventional cloning approaches limited the number of available recombinant virus cDNA clones. As genetic variability is considered an intrinsic feature of RNA viruses, it is thus reasonable to conclude that reverse genetics approaches to investigate natural virus functions and pathogenesis require improved systems that reflect the complexity of naturally occurring wild-type viruses, and that largely exclude adaption to cell culture conditions.In order to allow rapid cloning of wild-type NSV genome populations into reverse genetics vector plasmids, we developed a system in which cDNA copies of complete rhabdovirus populations are inserted into a plasmid bank by linear-to-linear homologous RecE/T recombination (LLHR ). Limited requirements for sequence information a priori, high cloning efficiencies, and the possibility to directly generate recombinant viruses from individual cDNA clones now offer novel opportunities to combine forward genetic dissection of natural rhabdovirus populations and downstream reverse genetics approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 56%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,459,013
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,378
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,209
of 421,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#468
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.