↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Reverse Genetics System for the Avian Coronavirus Infectious Bronchitis Virus
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Reverse Genetics System for the Avian Coronavirus Infectious Bronchitis Virus
Chapter number 6
Book title
Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6962-3, 978-1-4939-6964-7, 978-1-4939-6962-3, 978-1-4939-6964-7
Authors

Erica Bickerton, Sarah M. Keep, Paul Britton, Bickerton, Erica, Keep, Sarah M., Britton, Paul

Editors

Daniel R. Perez

Abstract

We have developed a reverse genetics system for the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in which a full-length cDNA corresponding to the IBV genome is inserted into the vaccinia virus genome under the control of a T7 promoter sequence. Vaccinia virus as a vector for the full-length IBV cDNA has the advantage that modifications can be introduced into the IBV cDNA using homologous recombination, a method frequently used to insert and delete sequences from the vaccinia virus genome. Here, we describe the use of transient dominant selection as a method for introducing modifications into the IBV cDNA that has been successfully used for the substitution of specific nucleotides, deletion of genomic regions, and exchange of complete genes. Infectious recombinant IBVs are generated in situ following the transfection of vaccinia virus DNA, containing the modified IBV cDNA, into cells infected with a recombinant fowlpox virus expressing T7 DNA-dependant RNA polymerase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,472,047
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,791
of 14,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,826
of 422,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#188
of 1,088 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,088 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.