↓ Skip to main content

The Biochemistry of Retinoid Signaling II

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Retinoic Acid Synthesis and Degradation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Retinoic Acid Synthesis and Degradation
Chapter number 5
Book title
The Biochemistry of Retinoid Signaling II
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0945-1_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-240943-7, 978-9-40-240945-1
Authors

Natalia Y. Kedishvili, Kedishvili, Natalia Y.

Editors

Mary Ann Asson-Batres, Cecile Rochette-Egly

Abstract

Retinoic acid (RA) was identified as the biologically active form of vitamin A almost 70 years ago and work on its function and mechanism of action is still of major interest both from a scientific and a clinical perspective. The currently accepted model postulates that RA is produced in two sequential oxidative steps: first, retinol is oxidized reversibly to retinaldehyde, and then retinaldehyde is oxidized irreversibly to RA. Excess RA is inactivated by conversion to hydroxylated derivatives. Much is left to learn, especially about retinoid binding proteins and the trafficking of the hydrophobic retinoid substrates between membrane bound and cytosolic enzymes. Here, background on development of the field and an update on recent advances in our understanding of the enzymatic pathways and mechanisms that control the rate of RA production and degradation are presented with a focus on the many questions that remain unanswered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 39 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Chemistry 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 45 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,150,926
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#31
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,741
of 313,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them