You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In Vivo Induction of T-Follicular Helper Cells by Modulation of Regulatory T Cell Function
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
T follicular Helper Cells
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2498-1_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2497-4, 978-1-4939-2498-1
|
| Authors |
James Badger Wing, Shimon Sakaguchi M.D., Ph.D., Shimon Sakaguchi |
| Editors |
Marion Espéli, Michelle Linterman |
| Abstract |
Regulatory T cells, particularly their follicular resident subset, T-follicular regulatory cells, play a critical role in the maintenance of immune homeostasis and prevention of the expansion of T-follicular helper cells. One of the key mechanisms used by these cells is CTLA-4 dependent suppression of inflammation. In this chapter, we detail methods to increase the formation of T-follicular helper cells following vaccination by either depleting Treg cells, via Foxp3 linked diphtheria toxin receptor, or blocking CTLA-4 function by the use of antibodies. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,529,032
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,939
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,820
of 353,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#483
of 998 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 998 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.