You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Methods to study the occurrence and the evolution of pseudogenes through a phylogenetic approach.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 7 |
Book title |
Pseudogenes
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0835-6_7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0834-9, 978-1-4939-0835-6
|
Authors |
Jacques Dainat, Pierre Pontarotti, Jacques Dainat Ph.D., Dainat, Jacques, Pontarotti, Pierre |
Editors |
Laura Poliseno |
Abstract |
During the last few years, the study of pseudogenes has excited enthusiasm, because it has been proven that at least some of them are involved in important biological processes. An accurate detection and analysis of pseudogenes can be achieved using comparative methods, but only the use of phylogenetic tools can provide accurate information about their birth, their evolution and their death, hence about the impact that they have on genes and genomes. Here, phylogenetic methods that allow studying pseudogene history are described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 5% |
Russia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,405,394
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,942
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,589
of 227,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.