↓ Skip to main content

Genotype Phenotype Coupling

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Construction of Synthetic VHH Libraries in Ribosome Display Format.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Construction of Synthetic VHH Libraries in Ribosome Display Format.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Genotype Phenotype Coupling
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3279-6_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163278-9, 978-1-07-163279-6
Authors

Guilbaud, Audrey, Pecorari, Frédéric

Abstract

Single-domain antibodies, or VHH, represent an attractive molecular basis to design affinity proteins with favorable properties. Beyond high affinity and specificity for their cognate target, they usually show high stability and high production yields in bacteria, yeast, or mammalian cells. In addition to these favorable properties, their ease of engineering makes them useful for many applications. Until the past few years, the generation of VHH involved the immunization of a Camelidae with the target antigen, followed by a phage display selection using phage libraries encoding the VHH repertoire of the animal blood sample. However, this approach is constrained by the accessibility to the animals, and the output relies on the animal's immune system.Recently, synthetic VHH libraries have been designed to avoid the use of animals. Here, we describe the construction of VHH combinatorial libraries and their use for the selection of binders by ribosome display, a fully in vitro selection technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,893,842
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,710
of 14,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,056
of 474,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#187
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.