↓ Skip to main content

Genotype Phenotype Coupling

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Isolation of Adhirons Specific for Plant Protoplast Membrane Biomarkers Is Simplified by Phagemid Design.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolation of Adhirons Specific for Plant Protoplast Membrane Biomarkers Is Simplified by Phagemid Design.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Genotype Phenotype Coupling
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3279-6_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163278-9, 978-1-07-163279-6
Authors

D'Ercole, Claudia, de Marco, Ario, D’Ercole, Claudia, Marco, Ario

Abstract

Phage display is an effective method to retrieve binders specific for a target epitope from a large clone library. Nevertheless, the panning process allows for the accumulation of some contaminant clones into the selected phage pool and, consequently, each clone requires individual screening to verify its actual specificity. This step is time-consuming, independently on the chosen method, and relies on the availability of reliable reagents. Since phages display a single binder responsible for the antigen recognition but their coat is formed by several repeats of the same proteins, the targeting of coat epitopes is often exploited to amplify the signal. Commercial anti-M13 antibodies are commonly labeled with peroxidase or FITC but customized antibodies might be necessary for specific applications. Here, we report a protocol describing the selection of anti-protoplast Adhirons that relies on the availability of nanobodies fused to a fluorescent protein to use during flow cytometry screening. Specifically, when preparing our Adhiron synthetic library, we designed a new phagemid that allows the expression of the clones fused to three tags. These can interact with a large variety of commercial and home-made reagents, selected according to the needs of the downstream characterization process. In the described case, we combined the ALFA-tagged Adhirons with an anti-ALFAtag nanobody fused with the fluorescent protein mRuby3.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,897,690
of 25,158,951 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,712
of 14,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,120
of 474,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#187
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,158,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.