↓ Skip to main content

Membrane Hydration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Hydration and Nanoconfined Water: Insights from Computer Simulations.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hydration and Nanoconfined Water: Insights from Computer Simulations.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Membrane Hydration
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19060-0_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-919059-4, 978-3-31-919060-0
Authors

Alarcón, Laureano M, Rodríguez Fris, J A, Morini, Marcela A, Sierra, M Belén, Accordino, S A, Montes de Oca, J M, Pedroni, Viviana I, Appignanesi, Gustavo A, Laureano M. Alarcón, J. A. Rodríguez Fris, Marcela A. Morini, M. Belén Sierra, S. A. Accordino, J. M. Montes de Oca, Viviana I. Pedroni, Gustavo A. Appignanesi

Editors

E. Anibal Disalvo

Abstract

The comprehension of the structure and behavior of water at interfaces and under nanoconfinement represents an issue of major concern in several central research areas like hydration, reaction dynamics and biology. From one side, water is known to play a dominant role in the structuring, the dynamics and the functionality of biological molecules, governing main processes like protein folding, protein binding and biological function. In turn, the same principles that rule biological organization at the molecular level are also operative for materials science processes that take place within a water environment, being responsible for the self-assembly of molecular structures to create synthetic supramolecular nanometrically-sized materials. Thus, the understanding of the principles of water hydration, including the development of a theory of hydrophobicity at the nanoscale, is imperative both from a fundamental and an applied standpoint. In this work we present some molecular dynamics studies of the structure and dynamics of water at different interfaces or confinement conditions, ranging from simple model hydrophobic interfaces with different geometrical constraints (in order to single out curvature effects), to self-assembled monolayers, proteins and phospholipid membranes. The tendency of the water molecules to sacrifice the lowest hydrogen bond (HB) coordination as possible at extended interfaces is revealed. This fact makes the first hydration layers to be highly oriented, in some situations even resembling the structure of hexagonal ice. A similar trend to maximize the number of HBs is shown to hold in cavity filling, with small subnanometric hydrophobic cavities remaining empty while larger cavities display an alternation of filled and dry states with a significant inner HB network. We also study interfaces with complex chemical and geometrical nature in order to determine how different conditions affect the local hydration properties. Thus, we show some results for protein hydration and, particularly, some preliminary studies on membrane hydration. Finally, calculations of a local hydrophobicity measure of relevance for binding and self-assembly are also presented. We then conclude with a few words of further emphasis on the relevance of this kind of knowledge to biology and to the design of new materials by highlighting the context-dependent and non-additive nature of different non-covalent interactions in an aqueous nanoenvironment, an issue that is usually greatly overlooked.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 2 20%
Chemistry 2 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,293,238
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#302
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,849
of 353,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.