You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Ecology of Yersinia pestis and the Epidemiology of Plague.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Yersinia pestis: Retrospective and Perspective
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-94-024-0890-4_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-40-240888-1, 978-9-40-240890-4
|
| Authors |
Vladimir M. Dubyanskiy, Aidyn B. Yeszhanov, Dubyanskiy, Vladimir M., Yeszhanov, Aidyn B. |
| Editors |
Ruifu Yang, Andrey Anisimov |
| Abstract |
This chapter summarizes information about the natural foci of plague in the world. We describe the location, main hosts, and vectors of Yersinia pestis. The ecological features of the hosts and vectors of plague are listed, including predators - birds and mammals and their role in the epizootic. The epizootic process in plague and the factors affecting the dynamics of epizootic activity of natural foci of Y. pestis are described in detail. The mathematical models of the epizootic process in plague and predictive models are briefly described. The most comprehensive list of the hosts and vectors of Y. pestis in the world is presented as well. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#635,126
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#69
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,090
of 395,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#12
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.