↓ Skip to main content

Yersinia pestis: Retrospective and Perspective

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Plague: A Disease Which Changed the Path of Human Civilization.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Plague: A Disease Which Changed the Path of Human Civilization.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Yersinia pestis: Retrospective and Perspective
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0890-4_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-240888-1, 978-9-40-240890-4
Authors

Barbara Bramanti, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Lars Walløe, Xu Lei, Bramanti, Barbara, Stenseth, Nils Chr., Walløe, Lars, Lei, Xu

Editors

Ruifu Yang, Andrey Anisimov

Abstract

Plague caused by Yersinia pestis is a zoonotic infection, i.e., it is maintained in wildlife by animal reservoirs and on occasion spills over into human populations, causing outbreaks of different entities. Large epidemics of plague, which have had significant demographic, social, and economic consequences, have been recorded in Western European historical documents since the sixth century. Plague has remained in Europe for over 1400 years, intermittently disappearing, yet it is not clear if there were reservoirs for Y. pestis in Western Europe or if the pathogen was rather reimported on different occasions from Asian reservoirs by human agency. The latter hypothesis thus far seems to be the most plausible one, as it is sustained by both ecological and climatological evidence, helping to interpret the phylogeny of this bacterium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 37 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 41 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,789,917
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#423
of 5,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,936
of 396,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#55
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.