Chapter title |
Parallel Computational Protein Design.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Computational Protein Design
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6637-0_13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6635-6, 978-1-4939-6637-0
|
Authors |
Yichao Zhou, Bruce R. Donald, Jianyang Zeng, Zhou, Yichao, Donald, Bruce R, Zeng, Jianyang, Donald, Bruce R. |
Editors |
Ilan Samish |
Abstract |
Computational structure-based protein design (CSPD) is an important problem in computational biology, which aims to design or improve a prescribed protein function based on a protein structure template. It provides a practical tool for real-world protein engineering applications. A popular CSPD method that guarantees to find the global minimum energy solution (GMEC) is to combine both dead-end elimination (DEE) and A* tree search algorithms. However, in this framework, the A* search algorithm can run in exponential time in the worst case, which may become the computation bottleneck of large-scale computational protein design process. To address this issue, we extend and add a new module to the OSPREY program that was previously developed in the Donald lab (Gainza et al., Methods Enzymol 523:87, 2013) to implement a GPU-based massively parallel A* algorithm for improving protein design pipeline. By exploiting the modern GPU computational framework and optimizing the computation of the heuristic function for A* search, our new program, called gOSPREY, can provide up to four orders of magnitude speedups in large protein design cases with a small memory overhead comparing to the traditional A* search algorithm implementation, while still guaranteeing the optimality. In addition, gOSPREY can be configured to run in a bounded-memory mode to tackle the problems in which the conformation space is too large and the global optimal solution cannot be computed previously. Furthermore, the GPU-based A* algorithm implemented in the gOSPREY program can be combined with the state-of-the-art rotamer pruning algorithms such as iMinDEE (Gainza et al., PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002335, 2012) and DEEPer (Hallen et al., Proteins 81:18-39, 2013) to also consider continuous backbone and side-chain flexibility. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 45% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
Engineering | 2 | 18% |
Computer Science | 2 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |