↓ Skip to main content

The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Noncoding RNAs in Therapeutic Resistance of Cancer.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Noncoding RNAs in Therapeutic Resistance of Cancer.
Chapter number 10
Book title
The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1498-7_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-101496-3, 978-9-81-101498-7, 978-9-81-101496-3, 978-9-81-101498-7
Authors

Lintao Jia, Angang Yang, Jia, Lintao, Yang, Angang

Editors

Erwei Song

Abstract

Despite the encouraging advances made to date in cancer therapy, the benefits to patients are frequently offset by the development of resistance to therapeutics. Given their involvement in regulating multiple aspects of gene expression and cell signaling that dictates the behaviors of malignant cells, it is not surprising that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) play pivotal roles in the resistance of cancers to clinically available therapeutics. Aberrant expression of these ncRNAs, attributed to inherent defects or stress-responsive variations, mediates cellular signaling that compensates for unfavorable molecular events elicited by the therapeutics, thereby preventing the pharmaceuticals from exerting their desired effects on their cellular targets; alternatively, ncRNAs may regulate cancer therapeutic sensitivity by affecting drug accessibility to neoplastic cells and in vivo drug metabolism. In addition, dysregulation of ncRNA expression in cancer stromal cells can impair the responsiveness of neoplastic cells to appropriate therapies. In this chapter, we will describe ncRNA-related mechanisms underlying cancer resistance to routine therapeutics, hopefully providing rationales for the development of drug-sensitizing strategies targeted against or based on these ncRNAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 71%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,340,423
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,972
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,407
of 355,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#77
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.