↓ Skip to main content

The Next Generation in Membrane Protein Structure Determination

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Membrane Protein Crystallisation: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Membrane Protein Crystallisation: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.
Chapter number 5
Book title
The Next Generation in Membrane Protein Structure Determination
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-35072-1_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-935070-7, 978-3-31-935072-1
Authors

Joanne L. Parker, Simon Newstead, Parker, Joanne L., Newstead, Simon

Editors

Isabel Moraes

Abstract

Alpha helical membrane proteins are the targets for many pharmaceutical drugs and play important roles in physiology and disease processes. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in determining their atomic structure using X-ray crystallography. However, a major bottleneck still remains; the identification of conditions that give crystals that are suitable for structure determination. Over the past 10 years we have been analysing the crystallisation conditions reported for alpha helical membrane proteins with the aim to facilitate a rational approach to the design and implementation of successful crystallisation screens. The result has been the development of MemGold, MemGold2 and the additive screen MemAdvantage. The associated analysis, summarised and updated in this chapter, has revealed a number of surprisingly successfully strategies for crystallisation and detergent selection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 34%
Student > Bachelor 26 22%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 45%
Chemistry 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,191,837
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#694
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,912
of 341,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#6
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.