↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 How to Derive “Ought” from “Is” Revisited
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 An Interview with John R. Searle
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Is and Ought: Where Does the Problem Lie?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Searlean “Is” and “Ought” Revisited
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Some Remarks on Searle’s View on the Logic of Practical Reasoning
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 On the Regulative Functions of Constitutive Rules
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Existence as a Source of Normativity: An Alternative to Searle’s View
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 How to Derive Is from Ought
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Searle vs. Conte on Constitutive Rules
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 “Ought” Is Spoken in Many Ways
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Constitutive Rules, Criteria of Validity, and Law
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Can Constitutive Rules Bridge the Gap Between Is- and Ought-Statements?
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Searle and Conte on Deriving Ought from Is
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Why Moral Norms Cannot Be Reduced to Facts: On a Trilemma in Derivations of Moral “Ought” from “Is”
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 On Searle’s Derivation and Its Relation to Constitutive Rules: A Social Scientist’s Perspective
Attention for Chapter 12: Can Constitutive Rules Bridge the Gap Between Is- and Ought-Statements?
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Summary Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Can Constitutive Rules Bridge the Gap Between Is- and Ought-Statements?
Chapter number 12
Book title
Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"
Published by
Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, February 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-54116-3_12
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-054115-6, 978-3-03-054116-3
Authors

Frank Hindriks, Hindriks, Frank

View on publisher site
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%

This page is provided by Altmetric.