↓ Skip to main content

The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 WT1 Mutation in Childhood Cancer.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Clinical Aspects of WT1 and the Kidney.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Role of WT1 in Embryonic Development and Normal Organ Homeostasis.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Tools and Techniques for Wt1-Based Lineage Tracing.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Biological Systems and Methods for Studying WT1 in the Epicardium.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation and Colony Formation of Murine Bone and Bone Marrow Cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation and Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting of Murine WT1-Expressing Adipocyte Precursor Cells.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Multiphoton Microscopy for Visualizing Lipids in Tissue.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Function and Regulation of the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor 1 (WT1) Gene in Fish.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Immunofluorescence Staining of Wt1 on Sections of Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Protocol for Podocyte Isolation in Adult Zebrafish.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 In Vitro Transcription to Study WT1 Function.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measuring Equilibrium Binding Constants for the WT1-DNA Interaction Using a Filter Binding Assay.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Methods to Identify and Validate WT1-RNA Interaction.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
Attention for Chapter 15: The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
Chapter number 15
Book title
The Wilms' Tumor (WT1) Gene
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-4023-3_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-4021-9, 978-1-4939-4023-3
Authors

da Silva, Fabio, Massa, Filippo, Schedl, Andreas, Fabio da Silva, Filippo Massa, Andreas Schedl, Silva, Fabio

Editors

Nicholas Hastie

Abstract

Identifying targets of transcriptional regulators such as the Wilms' tumor-suppressor protein (WT1) is an integral part of understanding the mechanisms governing the spatial and temporal activation of different genes. A commonly used strategy for studying transcription factors involves performing chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for the protein of interest with an appropriate antibody in crosslinked cells. Following ChIP, the enriched DNA is sequenced using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and the transcription factor target sites are identified via bioinformatics analysis. Here we provide a detailed protocol for performing a successful ChIP-Seq experiment for WT1. We have optimized and simplified the several steps necessary for the immunoprecipitation of WT1's target-binding sites. We also suggest several strategies for validating the experiment and provide brief guidelines on how to analyze the large amounts of data generated from high-throughout sequencing. This method can be adapted for a variety of different tissues and/or cell types to help understand the role of WT1 in regulating gene expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,811,101
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,245
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,802
of 393,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#752
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.