You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 20 |
| Book title |
Rare Diseases Epidemiology
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-04-819484-1, 978-9-04-819485-8
|
| Authors |
Helen Dolk, Maria Loane, Ester Garne, Ester Garne MD, Dolk, Helen, Loane, Maria, Garne, Ester |
| Editors |
Manuel Posada de la Paz, Stephen C. Groft |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 345 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 72 | 21% |
| Unknown | 84 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,718,061
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#612
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,769
of 95,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.