↓ Skip to main content

Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 459: Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems
Chapter number 459
Book title
Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_459
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923897-5, 978-3-31-923898-2
Authors

Perales, Celia, Domingo, Esteban, Celia Perales, Esteban Domingo

Abstract

The concept of error threshold derived from quasispecies theory is at the basis of lethal mutagenesis, a new antiviral strategy based on the increase of virus mutation rate above an extinction threshold. Research on this strategy is justified by several inhibitor-escape routes that viruses utilize to ensure their survival. Successive steps in the transition from an organized viral quasispecies into loss of biologically meaningful genomic sequences are dissected. The possible connections between theoretical models and experimental observations on lethal mutagenesis are reviewed. The possibility of using combination of virus-specific mutagenic nucleotide analogues and broad-spectrum, non-mutagenic inhibitors is evaluated. We emphasize the power that quasispecies theory has had to stimulate exploration of new means to combat pathogenic viruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,810,867
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#507
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,693
of 266,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.