↓ Skip to main content

Current Understanding and Treatment of Gliomas

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Current medical treatment of glioblastoma.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 165)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Current medical treatment of glioblastoma.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Current Understanding and Treatment of Gliomas
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12048-5_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-912047-8, 978-3-31-912048-5
Authors

Venur VA, Peereboom DM, Ahluwalia MS, Vyshak Alva Venur, David M. Peereboom, Manmeet S. Ahluwalia, Venur, Vyshak Alva, Peereboom, David M., Ahluwalia, Manmeet S.

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common adult malignant primary brain tumor. Despite the advances in therapeutic options, survival of patients with glioblastoma remains dismal at 15-18 months. Current standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal possible safe resection consistent with the preservation of neurologic function followed by concurrent temozolomide with radiation and adjuvant. Treatment options at recurrence include surgical resection with or without the placement of carmustine wafers, re-irradiation and chemotherapeutics such as nitrosoureas (lomustine, carmustine) or bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Cancer treatment and research
#38
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,451
of 359,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer treatment and research
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.