↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Microenvironment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Tumor Microenvironment
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tumor Microenvironment
Chapter number 10
Book title
Tumor Microenvironment
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26666-4_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-926664-0, 978-3-31-926666-4
Authors

Leek, Russell, Grimes, David Robert, Harris, Adrian L, McIntyre, Alan, Russell Leek, David Robert Grimes, Adrian L. Harris, Alan McIntyre, Harris, Adrian L.

Abstract

Regions of hypoxia in tumours can be modelled in vitro in 2D cell cultures with a hypoxic chamber or incubator in which oxygen levels can be regulated. Although this system is useful in many respects, it disregards the additional physiological gradients of the hypoxic microenvironment, which result in reduced nutrients and more acidic pH. Another approach to hypoxia modelling is to use three-dimensional spheroid cultures. In spheroids, the physiological gradients of the hypoxic tumour microenvironment can be inexpensively modelled and explored. In addition, spheroids offer the advantage of more representative modelling of tumour therapy responses compared with 2D culture. Here, we review the use of spheroids in hypoxia tumour biology research and highlight the different methodologies for spheroid formation and how to obtain uniformity. We explore the challenge of spheroid analyses and how to determine the effect on the hypoxic versus normoxic components of spheroids. We discuss the use of high-throughput analyses in hypoxia screening of spheroids. Furthermore, we examine the use of mathematical modelling of spheroids to understand more fully the hypoxic tumour microenvironment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,972
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,750
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#334
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.