↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Microenvironment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Tumor Microenvironment
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tumor Microenvironment
Chapter number 15
Book title
Tumor Microenvironment
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26666-4_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-926664-0, 978-3-31-926666-4
Authors

Alagappan, Muthuraman, Jiang, Dadi, Denko, Nicholas, Koong, Albert C, Muthuraman Alagappan, Dadi Jiang, Nicholas Denko, Albert C. Koong, Alagappan M, Jiang D, Denko N, Koong AC, Koong, Albert C.

Abstract

In silico drug discovery refers to a combination of computational techniques that augment our ability to discover drug compounds from compound libraries. Many such techniques exist, including virtual high-throughput screening (vHTS), high-throughput screening (HTS), and mechanisms for data storage and querying. However, presently these tools are often used independent of one another. In this chapter, we describe a new multimodal in silico technique for the hit identification and lead generation phases of traditional drug discovery. Our technique leverages the benefits of three independent methods-virtual high-throughput screening, high-throughput screening, and structural fingerprint analysis-by using a fourth technique called topological data analysis (TDA). We describe how a compound library can be independently tested with vHTS, HTS, and fingerprint analysis, and how the results can be transformed into a topological data analysis network to identify compounds from a diverse group of structural families. This process of using TDA or similar clustering methods to identify drug leads is advantageous because it provides a mechanism for choosing structurally diverse compounds while maintaining the unique advantages of already established techniques such as vHTS and HTS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 25%
Mathematics 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,006,543
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,315
of 5,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,007
of 402,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#130
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.