↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Microenvironment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Tumor Microenvironment
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tumor Microenvironment
Chapter number 11
Book title
Tumor Microenvironment
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26666-4_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-926664-0, 978-3-31-926666-4
Authors

Hu, Jing, Markowitz, Geoffrey, Wang, Xiao-Fan, Jing Hu, Geoffrey Markowitz, Xiao-Fan Wang

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO grade IV astrocytoma) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, with an average survival of slightly more than 1 year after initial diagnosis. GBMs display significant heterogeneity within the tumor mass, among which a subpopulation of cells called glioma-initiating cells (GICs) is responsible for tumorigenesis and resistance to conventional therapies. Therefore, understanding the mechanism underlying the biological properties of GICs would help develop better therapies to target this population for GBM treatment. This protocol provides detailed procedures to isolate GICs and non-GICs from patient's specimen and glioma xenografts, which serves as the first step for the biological studies of GICs. Upon separation of GICs and non-GICs, a series of studies, such as expression profiling and functional screen, etc., can be performed to identify signal pathways responsible for the malignant nature of GICs. Besides, translational studies can also be conducted to examine drug responses of GICs. In sum, isolation of GICs with reliable methods will provide the basis for the further biological studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,379,002
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,507
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,368
of 353,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#52
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.