↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Microenvironment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Tumor Microenvironment
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tumor Microenvironment
Chapter number 12
Book title
Tumor Microenvironment
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26666-4_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-926664-0, 978-3-31-926666-4
Authors

Cassetta, Luca, Noy, Roy, Swierczak, Agnieszka, Sugano, Gaël, Smith, Harriet, Wiechmann, Lisa, Pollard, Jeffrey W, Pollard, Jeffrey W., Luca Cassetta, Roy Noy, Agnieszka Swierczak, Gaël Sugano, Harriet Smith, Lisa Wiechmann, Jeffrey W. Pollard

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment is a complex network of cells that support tumor progression and malignancy. It has been demonstrated that tumor cells can educate the immune system to promote a tumor-friendly environment. Among all these immune cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are well represented and their presence in mouse models has been shown to promote tumor progression and metastasis. These effects are through the stimulation of angiogenesis, enhancement of tumor cell invasion and intravasation, immunosuppression, and at the metastatic site tumor cell extravasation and growth. However, the precise mechanisms are not fully understood. Furthermore there is limited information on TAMs derived from human cancers. For this reason it is important to be able to extract TAMs from tumors in order to compare their phenotypes, functions, and transcriptomes with normal resident tissue macrophages. Isolation of these cells is challenging due to the lack of markers and standardized protocols. Here we show an optimized protocol for the efficient isolation and extraction of resident macrophages and TAMs from human and mouse tissues by using multicolor flow cytometry. These protocols allow for the extraction of thousands of macrophages in less than 5 h from tissues as small as half a gram. The isolated macrophages can then be used for both "omics" and in vitro studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 24%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,972
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,539
of 353,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#110
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.