↓ Skip to main content

Focus on Bio-Image Informatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Focus on Bio-Image Informatics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Focus on Bio-Image Informatics
Chapter number 10
Book title
Focus on Bio-Image Informatics
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28549-8_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-928547-4, 978-3-31-928549-8
Authors

Peng, Hanchuan, Zhou, Jie, Zhou, Zhi, Bria, Alessandro, Li, Yujie, Kleissas, Dean Mark, Drenkow, Nathan G, Long, Brian, Liu, Xiaoxiao, Chen, Hanbo, Hanchuan Peng, Jie Zhou, Zhi Zhou, Alessandro Bria, Yujie Li, Dean Mark Kleissas, Nathan G. Drenkow, Brian Long, Xiaoxiao Liu, Hanbo Chen

Editors

Winnok H. De Vos, Sebastian Munck, Jean-Pierre Timmermans

Abstract

Bioimage informatics is a field wherein high-throughput image informatics methods are used to solve challenging scientific problems related to biology and medicine. When the image datasets become larger and more complicated, many conventional image analysis approaches are no longer applicable. Here, we discuss two critical challenges of large-scale bioimage informatics applications, namely, data accessibility and adaptive data analysis. We highlight case studies to show that these challenges can be tackled based on distributed image computing as well as machine learning of image examples in a multidimensional environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Engineering 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,374,585
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#38
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,668
of 333,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.