↓ Skip to main content

Focus on Bio-Image Informatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Focus on Bio-Image Informatics
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Focus on Bio-Image Informatics
Chapter number 4
Book title
Focus on Bio-Image Informatics
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28549-8_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-928547-4, 978-3-31-928549-8
Authors

Paparelli, Laura, Corthout, Nikky, Pavie, Benjamin, Annaert, Wim, Munck, Sebastian, Laura Paparelli, Nikky Corthout, Benjamin Pavie, Wim Annaert, Sebastian Munck

Editors

Winnok H. De Vos, Sebastian Munck, Jean-Pierre Timmermans

Abstract

The spatial distribution of proteins within the cell affects their capability to interact with other molecules and directly influences cellular processes and signaling. At the plasma membrane, multiple factors drive protein compartmentalization into specialized functional domains, leading to the formation of clusters in which intermolecule interactions are facilitated. Therefore, quantifying protein distributions is a necessity for understanding their regulation and function. The recent advent of super-resolution microscopy has opened up the possibility of imaging protein distributions at the nanometer scale. In parallel, new spatial analysis methods have been developed to quantify distribution patterns in super-resolution images. In this chapter, we provide an overview of super-resolution microscopy and summarize the factors influencing protein arrangements on the plasma membrane. Finally, we highlight methods for analyzing clusterization of plasma membrane proteins, including examples of their applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 32%
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Engineering 7 11%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,805,172
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#49
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,709
of 333,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.