↓ Skip to main content

Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Breast Cancer Survivorship: Where Are We Today?
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Special Issues in Younger Women with Breast Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Special Issues in Older Women with Breast Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Breast Cancer Among Special Populations: Disparities in Care Across the Cancer Control Continuum
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Symptoms: Fatigue and Cognitive Dysfunction
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Symptoms: Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Symptoms: Aromatase Inhibitor Induced Arthralgias
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Symptoms: Lymphedema
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Symptoms: Menopause, Infertility, and Sexual Health
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Host Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence: Genetic, Epigenetic and Biologic Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Comorbidities and Their Management: Potential Impact on Breast Cancer Outcomes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Current Controversies and Research Recommendations.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Risk Reduction from Weight Management and Physical Activity Interventions
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Quality of Care, Including Survivorship Care Plans.
Attention for Chapter 2: Special Issues in Younger Women with Breast Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Special Issues in Younger Women with Breast Cancer
Chapter number 2
Book title
Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16366-6_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-916365-9, 978-3-31-916366-6
Authors

Patricia A. Ganz, Julienne E. Bower, Annette L. Stanton

Abstract

Although women less than 50 years old make up less than 25 % of the patient population with breast cancer in industrialized countries, they have unique clinical and psychosocial issues that must be addressed as part of their oncology care to ensure the best health and psychosocial outcomes after treatment. Preserving fertility is a major issue for many younger women who have either not had children or would like to have additional children after treatment. Dealing with the disruption of a cancer diagnosis at a young age is challenging physically, socially and emotionally, and the health care system does not always address these patients' concerns. Because younger women have the potential for a long life expectancy after cancer treatment, preventing and reducing the risk for late effects of cancer treatment is very important. We discuss these and a range of other issues throughout this chapter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Psychology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,414,796
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,313
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,843
of 353,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#164
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.