Roles of the Contralateral Efferent Reflex in Hearing Demonstrated with Cochlear Implants
Physiology, Psychoacoustics and Cognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2016
Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda, Almudena Eustaquio-Martín, Joshua S. Stohl, Robert D. Wolford, Reinhold Schatzer, Blake S. Wilson, Lopez-Poveda, Enrique A, Eustaquio-Martín, Almudena, Stohl, Joshua S, Wolford, Robert D, Schatzer, Reinhold, Wilson, Blake S, Lopez-Poveda, Enrique A., Stohl, Joshua S., Wolford, Robert D., Wilson, Blake S.
Pim van Dijk, Deniz Başkent, Etienne Gaudrain, Emile de Kleine, Anita Wagner, Cris Lanting
Our two ears do not function as fixed and independent sound receptors; their functioning is coupled and dynamically adjusted via the contralateral medial olivocochlear efferent reflex (MOCR). The MOCR possibly facilitates speech recognition in noisy environments. Such a role, however, is yet to be demonstrated because selective deactivation of the reflex during natural acoustic listening has not been possible for human subjects up until now. Here, we propose that this and other roles of the MOCR may be elucidated using the unique stimulus controls provided by cochlear implants (CIs). Pairs of sound processors were constructed to mimic or not mimic the effects of the contralateral MOCR with CIs. For the non-mimicking condition (STD strategy), the two processors in a pair functioned independently of each other. When configured to mimic the effects of the MOCR (MOC strategy), however, the two processors communicated with each other and the amount of compression in a given frequency channel of each processor in the pair decreased with increases in the output energy from the contralateral processor. The analysis of output signals from the STD and MOC strategies suggests that in natural binaural listening, the MOCR possibly causes a small reduction of audibility but enhances frequency-specific inter-aural level differences and the segregation of spatially non-overlapping sound sources. The proposed MOC strategy could improve the performance of CI and hearing-aid users.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||3||14%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||3||14%|
|Student > Master||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||10%|