↓ Skip to main content

Growth Factors and Cytokines in Skeletal Muscle Development, Growth, Regeneration and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Growth Factors and Cytokines in Skeletal Muscle Development, Growth, Regeneration and Disease
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Growth Factors and Cytokines in Skeletal Muscle Development, Growth, Regeneration and Disease
Chapter number 1
Book title
Growth Factors and Cytokines in Skeletal Muscle Development, Growth, Regeneration and Disease
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27511-6_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-927509-3, 978-3-31-927511-6
Authors

Anderson, Judy E, Judy E. Anderson

Editors

Jason White, Gayle Smythe

Abstract

Satellite cells are the "currency" for the muscle growth that is critical to meat production in many species, as well as to phenotypic distinctions in development at the level of species or taxa, and for human muscle growth, function and regeneration. Careful research on the activation and behaviour of satellite cells, the stem cells in skeletal muscle, including cross-species comparisons, has potential to reveal the mechanisms underlying pathological conditions in animals and humans, and to anticipate implications of development, evolution and environmental change on muscle function and animal performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Sports and Recreations 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,255,539
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,099
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,478
of 300,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#44
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.