↓ Skip to main content

Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer
Chapter number 5
Book title
Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22909-6_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922908-9, 978-3-31-922909-6
Authors

Ma, Cynthia X, Bose, Ron, Ellis, Matthew J, Assoc. Prof. Cynthia X. Ma, Assoc. Prof. Ron Bose, Prof. Matthew J. Ellis, Cynthia X. Ma, Ron Bose, Matthew J. Ellis

Abstract

The estrogen-dependent nature of breast cancer is the fundamental basis for endocrine therapy. The presence of estrogen receptor (ER), the therapeutic target of endocrine therapy, is a prerequisite for this therapeutic approach. However, estrogen-independent growth often exists de novo at diagnosis or develops during the course of endocrine therapy. Therefore ER alone is insufficient in predicting endocrine therapy efficacy. Several RNA-based multigene assays are now available in clinical practice to assess distant recurrence risk, with majority of these assays evaluated in patients treated with 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. While MammaPrint and Oncotype Dx are most predictive of recurrence risk within the first 5 years of diagnosis, Prosigna, Breast Cancer Index (BCI), and EndoPredict Clin have also demonstrated utility in predicting late recurrence. In addition, PAM50, or Prosigna, provides further biological insights by classifying breast cancers into intrinsic molecular subtypes. Additional strategies are under investigation in prospective clinical trials to differentiate endocrine sensitive and resistant tumors and include on-treatment Ki-67 and Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) score in the setting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These biomarkers have become important tools in clinical practice for the identification of low risk patients for whom chemotherapy could be avoided. However, there is much work ahead toward the development of a molecular classification that informs the biology and novel therapeutic targets in high-risk disease as chemotherapy has only modest benefit in this population. The recognition of somatic mutations and their relationship to endocrine therapy responsiveness opens important opportunities toward this goal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,191,151
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,081
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,545
of 393,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#186
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.