↓ Skip to main content

Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer
Chapter number 11
Book title
Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22909-6_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922908-9, 978-3-31-922909-6
Authors

Parsons, Heather A, Beaver, Julia A, Park, Ben H, Heather A. Parsons, Julia A. Beaver, Ben H. Park

Abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA)-first identified in 1947-is "naked" DNA that is free-floating in the blood, and derived from both normal and diseased cells. In the 1970s, scientists observed that patients with cancer had elevated levels of ccfDNA as compared to their healthy, cancer-free counterparts. The maternal fetal medicine community first developed techniques to identify the small fraction of fetal-derived ccfDNA for diagnostic purposes. Similarly, due to the presence of tumor-specific (somatic) variations in all cancers, the fraction of circulating cell-free plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) in the larger pool of ccfDNA derived from normal cells can serve as extremely specific blood-based biomarkers for a patient's cancer. In theory this "liquid biopsy" can provide a real-time assessment of molecular tumor genotype (qualitative) and existing tumor burden (quantitative). Historically, the major limitation for ptDNA as a biomarker has been related to a low detection rate; however, current and developing techniques have improved sensitivity dramatically. In this chapter, we discuss these methods, including digital polymerase chain reaction and various approaches to tagged next-generation sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Chemistry 2 4%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,228,333
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,826
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,677
of 393,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#164
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.