↓ Skip to main content

Current and Future Reproductive Technologies and World Food Production

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: An australasian perspective on the role of reproductive technologies in world food production.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
An australasian perspective on the role of reproductive technologies in world food production.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Current and Future Reproductive Technologies and World Food Production
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8887-3_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8886-6, 978-1-4614-8887-3
Authors

Graeme B Martin, Graeme B. Martin, Martin, Graeme B.

Abstract

Industries based on small ruminants are major contributors to world food supply but, in extensive grazing systems, reproductive technology is not directly relevant to most enterprises. More important is the need to respond to demand in high-profit export markets for products that are 'clean, green and ethical' (CGE). This combination of issues led to the concept of CGE management of reproduction that is based on scientific evidence but does not require complex technology. Nutrition is the major challenge because we are limited primarily to the grazing of forages and pastures, but responding to this challenge opens up opportunities-new forages can supply energy and protein whilst improving animal health and welfare, and reducing carbon emissions. A second major factor is the need for accurate coordination of nutritional inputs with reproductive events to ensure that the metabolic signals are appropriate. To control of the timing of reproduction, we need to move beyond simply managing the presence of the male and seek more precision. Our ultimate CGE package is thus based on manipulation of male socio-sexual signals as well as nutrition, in combination with greater use of ultrasound and birth-site management to prevent neonatal mortality. Finally, genetics is critical in the development of the CGE package.It would be difficult to incorporate the entire package in one hit-adaptations are needed to cover variations in genotype and the geographical and socio-economic environment, and some concepts need research and development. Therefore, we have suggested staged introduction of the elements of the package.CGE management can be simple and cost-effective, and improve productivity whilst safeguarding the future of the industries in society and the marketplace. Reproductive technology might not be used by many farmers but it will be an essential tool for realizing the vision because it underpins the acceleration of genetic progress in otherwise tardy grazing industries. Finally, we suggest that the socio-economic drivers and the scientific principles of CGE management are also applicable to smallholders in developing economies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,209,145
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,949
of 4,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,708
of 305,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#112
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.