↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota of the Human Body

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Studying the Human Microbiota
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Studying the Human Microbiota
Chapter number 2
Book title
Microbiota of the Human Body
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-931246-0, 978-3-31-931248-4
Authors

Alan W. Walker, Walker, Alan W

Editors

Andreas Schwiertz

Abstract

There are a range of methodologies available to study the human microbiota, ranging from traditional approaches such as culturing through to state-of-the-art developments in next generation DNA sequencing technologies. The advent of molecular techniques in particular has opened up tremendous new avenues for research, and has galvanised interest in the study of our microbial inhabitants. Given the dazzling array of available options, however, it is important to understand the inherent advantages and limitations of each technique so that the best approach can be employed to address the particular research objective. In this chapter we cover some of the most widely used current techniques in human microbiota research and highlight the particular strengths and caveats associated with each approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 16 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,802,399
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,104
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,326
of 304,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#67
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.