↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota of the Human Body

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: A Short Definition of Terms
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Short Definition of Terms
Chapter number 1
Book title
Microbiota of the Human Body
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-931246-0, 978-3-31-931248-4
Authors

Andreas Schwiertz, Volker Rusch, Schwiertz, Andreas, Rusch, Volker

Editors

Andreas Schwiertz

Abstract

We humans are colonized by myriads of microorganisms in various parts of the body, such as the skin, the mouth, the vagina and the gastrointestinal tract. Even the lung and other hitherto thought to be sterile parts, as the placenta, are now considered to be colonized. Furthermore, our microbiota is not only comprised of bacteria, but also archaea and eukaryotes such as protozoa, fungi and nematodes. Even viruses of all three cellular domains, collectively termed the virome, can be found in the microbiota (Virgin 2014). It has been estimated that the human-associated microbiota, consists of at least 40,000 bacterial strains in 1800 genera (Luckey 1972; Frank and Pace 2008; Forsythe and Kunze 2013), which collectively harbor at least 9.9 million non-human genes (Li et al. 2014). They encode for approximately 500 times the human protein-coding genes which are currently annotated ( http://www.ensembl.org ). The estimated mass of the microbiota (1-2 kg in an adult body (Forsythe and Kunze 2013)) is comparable to the weight of the adult human brain (ca. 1.5 kg, Parent and Carpenter 1996).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,802,399
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,104
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,326
of 304,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#67
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.