↓ Skip to main content

Translational Research in Pain and Itch

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptors Offer Potential New Targets for Pain Therapy
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptors Offer Potential New Targets for Pain Therapy
Chapter number 7
Book title
Translational Research in Pain and Itch
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-7537-3_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-177535-9, 978-9-40-177537-3
Authors

Tiwari, Vineeta, Tiwari, Vinod, He, Shaoqiu, Zhang, Tong, Raja, Srinivasa N, Dong, Xinzhong, Guan, Yun, Vineeta Tiwari, Vinod Tiwari, Shaoqiu He, Tong Zhang, Srinivasa N. Raja, Xinzhong Dong, Yun Guan, Raja, Srinivasa N.

Abstract

The founding member of the Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor (Mrgpr) family was discovered in 1986. Since then, many more members of this receptor family have been identified in multiple species, and their physiologic functions have been investigated widely. Because they are expressed exclusively in small-diameter primary sensory neurons, the roles of Mrgpr proteins in pain and itch have been best studied. This review will focus specifically on the current knowledge of their roles in pathological pain and the potential development of new pharmacotherapies targeted at some Mrgprs for the treatment of chronic pain. We will also discuss the limitations and future scope of this receptor family in pain treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Neuroscience 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,550,714
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#849
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,950
of 393,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#79
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.