↓ Skip to main content

Translational Research in Pain and Itch

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Integrated, Team-Based Chronic Pain Management: Bridges from Theory and Research to High Quality Patient Care
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Integrated, Team-Based Chronic Pain Management: Bridges from Theory and Research to High Quality Patient Care
Chapter number 10
Book title
Translational Research in Pain and Itch
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-7537-3_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-177535-9, 978-9-40-177537-3
Authors

Driscoll, Mary A, Kerns, Robert D, Mary A. Driscoll, Robert D. Kerns, Driscoll, Mary A., Kerns, Robert D.

Abstract

Chronic pain is a significant public health concern. For many, chronic pain is associated with declines in physical functioning and increases in emotional distress. Additionally, the socioeconomic burden associated with costs of care, lost wages and declines in productivity are significant. A large and growing body of research continues to support the biopsychosocial model as the predominant framework for conceptualizing the experience of chronic pain and its multiple negative impacts. The model also informs a widely accepted and empirically supported approach for the optimal management of chronic pain. This chapter briefly articulates the historical foundations of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain followed by a relatively detailed discussion of an empirically informed, integrated, multimodal and interdisciplinary treatment approach. The role of mental health professionals, especially psychologists, in the management of chronic pain is particularly highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 15%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 28 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Psychology 9 11%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 31 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,789,675
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,103
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,695
of 393,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#264
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.