You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Psychiatric Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Psychiatric Disorders
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-457-5, 978-1-61779-458-2
|
| Authors |
Dinieri JA1, Hurd YL, Jennifer A. DiNieri, Yasmin L. Hurd, DiNieri, Jennifer A., Hurd, Yasmin L. |
| Abstract |
Marijuana (Cannabis sativa) is the illicit drug most commonly used by two vulnerable populations relevant to neurodevelopment-pregnant women and teenagers. Human longitudinal studies have linked prenatal and adolescent cannabis exposure with long-term behavioral abnormalities as well as increased vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders in adulthood. Animal models provide a means of studying the neurobiological mechanisms underlying these long-term effects. This chapter provides an overview of the animal models we have used to study the developmental impact of cannabis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,173,430
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#738
of 13,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,461
of 244,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#44
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.