↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Developmental Toxicology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Volume Overview: Introduction
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vivo Models of Developmental Toxicology
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model in Developmental Toxicology
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Zebrafish Embryo Developmental Toxicology Assay
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Gene Knockdown by Morpholino-Modified Oligonucleotides in the Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) Model: Applications for Developmental Toxicology
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 An Amphibian Model for Studies of Developmental Reproductive Toxicity
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Avian Models in Teratology and Developmental Toxicology
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Overview of In Vitro Models in Developmental Toxicology
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Primary Cell and Micromass Culture in Assessing Developmental Toxicity
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Embryonic Stem Cell Test: Stem Cell Use in Predicting Developmental Cardiotoxicity and Osteotoxicity
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Adherent Cell Differentiation and Cytotoxicity Assay
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 The murine limb bud in culture as an in vitro teratogenicity test system.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Rodent Whole Embryo Culture
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Rabbit Whole Embryo Culture
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Assessment of Xenobiotic Biotransformation Including Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in the Embryo Using Benzene as an Example
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Methodological Approaches to Cytochrome P450 Profiling in Embryos
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Analysis of Nrf2-Mediated Transcriptional Induction of Antioxidant Response in Early Embryos
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Regulation and Control of AP-1 Binding Activity in Embryotoxicity
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Thioredoxin Redox Status Assessment During Embryonic Development: The Redox Western
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Methods for the Determination of Plasma or Tissue Glutathione Levels
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Oxidative Stress, Thiols, and Redox Profiles
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Review of Toxicogenomic Approaches in Developmental Toxicology
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Epigenetic Approaches and Methods in Developmental Toxicology: Role of HDAC Inhibition in Teratogenic Events.
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 DNA methylation screening and analysis.
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Assessment of Histiotrophic Nutrition Using Fluorescent Probes
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Diabetic Embryopathy
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Gene Expression Analysis in Developing Embryos: In Situ Hybridization
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Assessment of Gross Fetal Malformations: The Modernized Wilson Technique and Skeletal Staining
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental Toxicology
Published by
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-867-2
ISBNs
978-1-61779-866-5, 978-1-61779-867-2
Authors

Harris, Craig, Hansen, Jason M.

Editors

Craig Harris, Jason M. Hansen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 16%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,170,868
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,467
of 14,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,717
of 250,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#86
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.