You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 196 |
| Book title |
Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/7651_2015_196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3033-3, 978-1-4939-3034-0
|
| Authors |
Burridge PW, Diecke S, Matsa E, Sharma A, Wu H, Wu JC, Paul W. Burridge Ph.D., Sebastian Diecke, Elena Matsa, Arun Sharma, Haodi Wu, Joseph C. Wu M.D., Ph.D., Paul W. Burridge, Joseph C. Wu |
| Editors |
Andras Nagy, Kursad Turksen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 25% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,080,205
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,381
of 13,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,335
of 255,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#31
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.