↓ Skip to main content

Glucocorticoid Signaling

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 17: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Conclusions and Future Directions.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Glucocorticoid Signaling
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2894-1, 978-1-4939-2895-8
Authors

Wang, Jen-Chywan, Harris, Charles, Jen-Chywan Wang, Charles Harris

Abstract

We hope this book has provided a robust introduction to glucocorticoid action. We have provided a historical perspective on discoveries related to glucocorticoid action: from the discovery of the hormones, their use as therapeutics for inflammatory disease, biochemical identification of receptors and finally the cloning of the glucocorticoid receptor. This has led to identification of not only the primary amino acid sequence, but structural information gleaned from both X-ray crystallography as well as nuclear magnetic resonance approaches. We hope the reader comes away with a better understanding of the many actions of glucocorticoids on various tissues and cell types. Indeed, one of the unanswered questions in our field is how one hormone and receptor can have such varied transcriptional responses in different cell types. Surely, some of this will be explained by epigenetic modifications that occur in different cell types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,420,033
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,314
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,851
of 353,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#164
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.