↓ Skip to main content

Biobanking in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Biobanking for Personalized Medicine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biobanking for Personalized Medicine
Chapter number 5
Book title
Biobanking in the 21st Century
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20579-3_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920578-6, 978-3-31-920579-3
Authors

Angen Liu, Kai Pollard, Liu, Angen, Pollard, Kai

Abstract

A biobank is an entity that collects, processes, stores, and distributes biospecimens and relevant data for use in basic, translational, and clinical research. Biobanking of high-quality human biospecimens such as tissue, blood and other bodily fluids along with associated patient clinical information provides a fundamental scientific infrastructure for personalized medicine. Identification of biomarkers that are specifically associated with particular medical conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and neurological disorders are useful for early detection, prevention, and treatment of the diseases. The ability to determine individual tumor biomarkers and to use those biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of response to therapy is having a very significant impact on personalized medicine and is rapidly changing the way clinical care is conducted. As a critical requirement for personalized medicine is the availability of a large collection of patient samples with well annotated patient clinical and pathological data, biobanks thus play an important role in personalized medicine advancement. The goal of this chapter is to explore the role of biobanks in personalized medicine and discuss specific needs regarding biobank development for translational and clinical research, especially for personalized medicine advancement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Computer Science 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 28 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,525,716
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#555
of 5,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,554
of 365,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#30
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.