↓ Skip to main content

Biobanking in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Biobanking in the 21st Century
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biobanking in the 21st Century
Chapter number 2
Book title
Biobanking in the 21st Century
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20579-3_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920578-6, 978-3-31-920579-3
Authors

Somiari, Stella B, Somiari, Richard I, Stella B. Somiari, Richard I. Somiari, Somiari, Stella B., Somiari, Richard I.

Abstract

Biobanking of human biological specimens has evolved from the simple private collection of often poorly annotated residual clinical specimens, to well annotated and organized collections setup by commercial and not-for-profit organizations. The activities of biobanks is now the focus of international and government agencies in recognition of the need to adopt best practices and provide scientific, ethical and legal guidelines for the industry. The demand for more, high quality and clinically annotated biospecimens will increase, primarily due to the unprecedented level of genomic, post genomic and personalized medicine research activities going on. Demand for more biospecimens provides new challenges and opportunities for developing strategies to build biobanking into a business that is better able to supply the biospecimen needs of the future. A paradigm shift is required particularly in organization and funding, as well as in how and where biospecimens are collected, stored and distributed. New collection sites, organized as Research Ready Hospitals (RRHs) and new public-private partnership models are needed for sustainability and increased biospecimen availability. Biobanks will need to adopt industry-wide standard operating procedures, better and "non-destructive" methods for quality assessment, less expensive methods for sample storage/distribution, and objective methods to manage scarce biospecimens. Ultimately, the success of future biobanks will rely greatly on the success of public-private partnerships, number and diversity of available biospecimens, cost management and the realization that an effective biobank is one that provides high quality and affordable biospecimens to drive research that leads to better health and quality of life for all.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,416,191
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,510
of 4,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,628
of 353,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#119
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.