↓ Skip to main content

Nonribosomal Peptide and Polyketide Biosynthesis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Nonribosomal Peptide and Polyketide Biosynthesis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Structural Biology of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Assembly Line Enzymology of Polyketide Biosynthesis.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Measurement of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase Adenylation Domain Activity Using a Continuous Hydroxylamine Release Assay
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Affinity Purification Method for the Identification of Nonribosomal Peptide Biosynthetic Enzymes Using a Synthetic Probe for Adenylation Domains
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Colorimetric Detection of the Adenylation Activity in Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Facile Synthetic Access to Glycopeptide Antibiotic Precursor Peptides for the Investigation of Cytochrome P450 Action in Glycopeptide Antibiotic Biosynthesis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Reconstitution of Fungal Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases in Yeast and In Vitro.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Continuing Development of E. coli as a Heterologous Host for Complex Natural Product Biosynthesis
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Screening for Expressed Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases and Polyketide Synthases Using LC-MS/MS-Based Proteomics.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Enhancing Nonribosomal Peptide Biosynthesis in Filamentous Fungi.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Situ Analysis of Bacterial Lipopeptide Antibiotics by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Secondary Metabolic Pathway-Targeted Metabolomics.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Annotating and Interpreting Linear and Cyclic Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Bioinformatics Tools for the Discovery of New Nonribosomal Peptides
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Use of ClusterMine360 for the Analysis of Polyketide and Nonribosomal Peptide Biosynthetic Pathways.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Alignment-Free Methods for the Detection and Specificity Prediction of Adenylation Domains.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Characterization of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases with NRPSsp.
Attention for Chapter 16: Alignment-Free Methods for the Detection and Specificity Prediction of Adenylation Domains.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Alignment-Free Methods for the Detection and Specificity Prediction of Adenylation Domains.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Nonribosomal Peptide and Polyketide Biosynthesis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3375-4_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3373-0, 978-1-4939-3375-4
Authors

Agüero-Chapin, Guillermin, Pérez-Machado, Gisselle, Sánchez-Rodríguez, Aminael, Santos, Miguel Machado, Antunes, Agostinho, Guillermin Agüero-Chapin, Gisselle Pérez-Machado, Aminael Sánchez-Rodríguez, Miguel Machado Santos, Agostinho Antunes

Abstract

Identifying adenylation domains (A-domains) and their substrate specificity can aid the detection of nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) at genome/proteome level and allow inferring the structure of oligopeptides with relevant biological activities. However, that is challenging task due to the high sequence diversity of A-domains (~10-40 % of amino acid identity) and their selectivity for 50 different natural/unnatural amino acids. Altogether these characteristics make their detection and the prediction of their substrate specificity a real challenge when using traditional sequence alignment methods, e.g., BLAST searches. In this chapter we describe two workflows based on alignment-free methods intended for the identification and substrate specificity prediction of A-domains.To identify A-domains we introduce a graphical-numerical method, implemented in TI2BioP version 2.0 (topological indices to biopolymers), which in a first step uses protein four-color maps to represent A-domains. In a second step, simple topological indices (TIs), called spectral moments, are derived from the graphical representations of known A-domains (positive dataset) and of unrelated but well-characterized sequences (negative set). Spectral moments are then used as input predictors for statistical classification techniques to build alignment-free models. Finally, the resulting alignment-free models can be used to explore entire proteomes for unannotated A-domains. In addition, this graphical-numerical methodology works as a sequence-search method that can be ensemble with homology-based tools to deeply explore the A-domain signature and cope with the diversity of this class (Aguero-Chapin et al., PLoS One 8(7):e65926, 2013).The second workflow for the prediction of A-domain's substrate specificity is based on alignment-free models constructed by transductive support vector machines (TSVMs) that incorporate information of uncharacterized A-domains. The construction of the models was implemented in the NRPSpredictor and in a first step uses the physicochemical fingerprint of the 34 residues lining the active site of the phenylalanine-adenylation domain of gramicidin synthetase A [PDB ID 1 amu] to derive a feature vector. Homologous positions were extracted for A-domains with known and unknown substrate specificities and turned into feature vectors. At the same time, A-domains with known specificities towards similar substrates were clustered by physicochemical properties of amino acids (AA). In a second step, support vector machines (SVMs) were optimized from feature vectors of characterized A-domains in each of the resulting clusters. Later, SVMs were used in the variant of TSVMs that integrate a fraction of uncharacterized A-domains during training to predict unknown specificities. Finally, uncharacterized A-domains were scored by each of the constructed alignment-free models (TSVM) representing each substrate specificity resulting from the clustering. The model producing the largest score for the uncharacterized A-domain assigns the substrate specificity to it (Rausch et al., Nucleic Acids Res 33:5799-5808, 2005).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Belgium 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Computer Science 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,455,370
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,622
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,596
of 393,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#349
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.