| Chapter title |
The Role of Inspiratory Muscle Training in the Process of Rehabilitation of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 194 |
| Book title |
Respirology
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/5584_2015_194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-925851-5, 978-3-31-925853-9
|
| Authors |
Majewska-Pulsakowska, M, Wytrychowski, K, Rożek-Piechura, K, M. Majewska-Pulsakowska, K. Wytrychowski, K. Rożek-Piechura, Majewska-Pulsakowska, M., Wytrychowski, K., Rożek-Piechura, K. |
| Abstract |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) adversely affects the quality of life and life expectancy of patients. Shortness of breath, cough, and fatigue in lower limbs are the main reasons limiting physical activities of patients. The lack of physical activity results in poorer muscle strength. The latest guidelines regarding breathing rehabilitation in COPD patients emphasize a significant role of inspiratory muscle exercises. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an 8-week long inspiratory muscle training, interval training on a cycle ergometer, and training combining both kinds of rehabilitation, on pulmonary function, health-related quality of life, and the tolerance to exercise in patients with COPD. The study was conducted in a group of 43 patients with diagnosed COPD stage II and III according to GOLD. They were randomly divided into four training groups: inspiratory muscle training (Group 1), cycle ergometer training (Group 2), cycle ergometer and inspiratory muscle training (Group 3), control group - patients who did not participate in any rehabilitation programs (Group 4 - control). Before the rehabilitation process and after its completion the patients were medically examined, they completed a health-related quality of life questionnaire, performed a 6-min walk test, spirometry, and a treadmill exercise test according to the modified Bruce protocol. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in the quality of life measured for Group 3 in comparison with the control group. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |