↓ Skip to main content

Respirology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 188: Relationships Between Tobacco Abuse and Self-Assessment of Health
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Relationships Between Tobacco Abuse and Self-Assessment of Health
Chapter number 188
Book title
Respirology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_188
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-925851-5, 978-3-31-925853-9
Authors

A Gawlikowska-Sroka, E Dzięciołowska-Baran, J Szczurowski, A. Gawlikowska-Sroka, E. Dzięciołowska-Baran, J. Szczurowski, Gawlikowska-Sroka, A., Dzięciołowska-Baran, E., Szczurowski, J.

Abstract

Smoking cigarettes negatively influences the functioning of the body. Among other effects, it has an important impact on the respiratory system, circulation, and behavior. It leads to morphological and physiological changes in organs and tissues, so it can change mood. The aim of this study was to assess the relationships between tobacco abuse and self-assessment of health. The survey was conducted among Polish (243) and foreign (80) medical students at the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland. The study was based on a survey questionnaire of the authors' own design, comprising open and multi-choice questions. Our questionnaire was based on the international standard questionnaire from the Health Behavior in School-Aged Children study (Currie et al. 2009). 80 % of students surveyed were free of any chronic diseases. The results showed that only 23 % of the women and 20 % of the men assessed their health as very good, over 60 % as good, and the remaining at lower levels. We did not observe significant differences between smokers and non-smokers. Physical activity in both groups was generally assessed as good or sufficient. We did not observe significant differences between groups in the incidence of headache, abdominal pain, or vertigo. Significant differences were found in the intake of painkillers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 38%
Psychology 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,302,535
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,971
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,613
of 395,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#313
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.