↓ Skip to main content

Respirology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 187: Respiratory Toxicity of Dimethyl Sulfoxide.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Respiratory Toxicity of Dimethyl Sulfoxide.
Chapter number 187
Book title
Respirology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_187
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-925851-5, 978-3-31-925853-9
Authors

Takeda, Kotaro, Pokorski, Mieczyslaw, Sato, Yutaka, Oyamada, Yoshitaka, Okada, Yasumasa, Kotaro Takeda, Mieczyslaw Pokorski, Yutaka Sato, Yoshitaka Oyamada, Yasumasa Okada

Abstract

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is one of the most commonly used solvents for hydrophobic substances in biological experiments. In addition, the compound exhibits a plethora of bioactivities, which makes it of potential pharmacological use of its own. The influence on respiration, and thus on arterial blood oxygenation, of DMSO is unclear, contentious, and an area of limited study. Thus, in the present investigation we set out to determine the influence on lung ventilation of cumulated doses of DMSO in the amount of 0.5, 1.5, 3.5, 7.5, and 15.5 g/kg; each dose given intraperitoneally at 1 h interval in conscious mice. Ventilation and its responses to 7 % hypoxia (N2 balanced) were recorded in a whole body plethsymograph. We demonstrate a dose-dependent inhibitory effect of DMSO on lung ventilation and its hypoxic responsiveness, driven mostly by changes in the tidal component. The maximum safe dose of DMSO devoid of meaningful consequences for respiratory function was 3.5 g/kg. The dose of 7.5 g/kg of DMSO significantly dampened respiration, with yet well preserved hyperventilatory response to hypoxia. The highest dose of 15.5 g/kg severely impaired ventilation and its responses. The study delineates the safety profile of DMSO regarding the respiratory function which is essential for maintaining proper tissue oxygenation. Caution should be exercised concerning dose concentration of DMSO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Chemistry 3 17%
Engineering 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,300,248
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,970
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,760
of 393,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#321
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.