↓ Skip to main content

microRNA: Basic Science

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Computational Prediction of microRNA Targets
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Computational Prediction of microRNA Targets
Chapter number 12
Book title
microRNA: Basic Science
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22380-3_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922379-7, 978-3-31-922380-3
Authors

Laganà, Alessandro, Alessandro Laganà

Abstract

Computational prediction of microRNA (miRNA) targets is a fundamental step towards the characterization of miRNA function and the understanding of their role in disease. A single miRNA can regulate hundreds of different gene transcripts through partial sequence complementarity and a single gene may be regulated by several miRNAs acting cooperatively. The remarkable advances made in recent years have allowed the identification of key features for functional miRNA binding sites. A plethora of prediction tools are now available, but their accuracies remain rather poor, as miRNA target recognition has revealed itself to be a very complex and dynamic mechanism, still only partially understood.In this chapter, the principles of miRNA target prediction in animals are presented, together with the most up-to-date and effective computational approaches and tools available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 4 24%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 29%
Computer Science 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,243,953
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,098
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,847
of 353,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#91
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.